06-23-23
Today's commentary on various articles and events
Orientation for new readers regarding the underlying research and data for this blog
Barbados Demands to Transform the Global Financial System
Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley called for a transformation of the global financial system that goes beyond reforming international financial institutions (IFIs) such as the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Global problems like the climate crisis show us that we simply cannot address modern issues with institutions, which were created for a very different world nearly 80 years ago. Change is needed. That is why I am in Paris for the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact,” she said. …
Ugandan activist Vanessa Nakate reminded participants that “broken promises cost lives” and called for overturning the fossil fuel economy, which yields notable profits for Western oil consortia but very little for resource-supplying countries.
Based on the comments from the participants, it’s clear that these quotes are sophistry posing as progressivism. This high-level summit was promoted by French President Emmanuel Macron and included United Nations Secretary Antonio Guterres, the IMF Director Kristalina Georgieva, and U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen—all executive-level puppets of the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel.
In actuality, the core issue for global transformation is the elimination of private control over money creation, which means turning the Fed, IMF, and World Bank into public utilities. The so-called “climate change” issue is an initiative of the powers-that-be based on manipulated temperature data and the use of HAARP and other technology to create extreme weather and geologic events. (This does not mean that temperatures haven’t gone up, just not to the degree that is being promoted. And yes, something needs to be done about this.) And, finally, calling petrochemicals “fossil fuels” is woefully out of date, since it has been proved that oil is abiotic; that is, it is created within the earth and is not related to prehistoric animal life.
In sum, we don’t expect any positive changes coming from this group.
Iowa’s Joni Ernst partners with Democrat to limit Chinese purchase of US farmland
The publisher of this article, American Military News, forgot to mention that Bill Gates and other billionaires have acquired a comparable amount of farmland (and even a higher percentage of food production facilities and distribution entities) and that, based on their stated agenda, they represent a far greater risk than China.
Billionaire-funded eco group quietly taking farmland out of production in rural America
Big Pharma Set to Control Entire Food Supply. Monsanto-Bayer and Bill Gates Join Hands
Bill Gates tells Reddit why he’s bought so much farmland
Another means for the cartel to “reduce the surplus population” is to put them out on the streets:
Half of homeless Californians are over 50, didn’t earn enough to pay bills
According to LA County Public Health, the death rate increased 55% among people who are homeless between 2019 and 2021.
The report published Tuesday by the University of California, San Francisco showed 47% of single adults living homeless in the state are over the age of 50, with black and Native Americans “dramatically overrepresented” in the group.
No matter how thoroughly the financial elites try to bury the extent of their participation in child trafficking and pedophilia, it keeps coming back to haunt them. Not only is it the number one crime by which they blackmail many of their executive-level puppets, including Presidents, Princes, and other powerful persons, but it reveals the depth of depravity found in this entire class of perverts.
Peters introduces bill to push Defense Dept. to separate from Chinese critical minerals
As we have noted previously, China controls a number of rare earth metals that are required for military purposes. So, add this to the list of reasons why Blinken says that detachment from China (at this time) would be disastrous. Later, when the US is not dependent of another nation’s resources, then it will have no qualms about sanctioning them, for example this:
General Electric stops servicing gas turbines at Russian thermal power plants
Along the same lines, the EU, another of the banking cartel’s public-sector subsidiaries, continues to pretend that they are not supporting the neo-Nazi’s installed and armed via the 2014 US-backed coup d’etat in Ukraine.
European Union Sets 11th Package of Sanctions Against Russia
This latest round of restrictions comes down from the financiers in response to various members of the EU finding ways to get around the sanctions and buy oil and gas from Russia at a better price than the inflated US deliveries.
The cartel is destroying the European economy in the process of attempting to cripple Russia’s economy, which keeps growing despite these acts of war.
EU Proposes Allocating €50 Billion in Aid to Ukraine
In addition to decimating Europe, the cartel is putting the member states further into debt to finance its war against Russia, all based on the lie that Russia’s defense of ethnic Russians was unprovoked.
Meanwhile, as we have documented, China’s and Russia’s effort to replace the cartel’s SWIFT system for foreign exchange is proceeding.
Venezuela is on Track to Use the Russian Payment System MIR
Biden ‘dictator’ comment sparks Beijing backlash
Frankly, we don’t know whether the person who appears as Joe Biden is actually the former Senator from Delaware or some stand-in or two, not that it matters given that his lines are written by US intelligence in service to the financiers; but, in any case, this is an example of how “Biden” has been turned into a clown, just like Trump, spouting garbage as if he were some overly propagandized lunk picked off the street.
In this tiresome game of “good-cop, bad cop,” the Secretary of State pretends to be the diplomat, though to most of the world he is just another cartel thug.
Another example of Biden’s logical deficiency and, frankly, his own dictatorial streak:
Biden mocks gun owners, says they’ll need F-16s to take on government
“We have to change,” Biden said about gun violence during a private fundraising event in California on Tuesday, according to Fox News. “There’s a lot of things we can change, because the American people by and large agree you don’t need a weapon of war. I’m a Second Amendment guy. I taught it for four years, six years in law school. And guess what? It doesn’t say that you can own any weapon you want. It says there are certain weapons that you just can’t own. Even during when it was passed, you couldn’t own a cannon. You can’t own a machine gun.… No, I’m serious.”
“You know, I love these guys who say the Second Amendment is — you know, the tree of liberty is water with the blood of patriots. Well, if [you] want to do that, you want to work against the government, you need an F-16. You need something else than just an AR-15,” he added.
Before we point out the senselessness of Biden’s remarks, let’s look at the entirety of the Second Amendment:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
That’s the whole of it. So, when Biden says …
It doesn’t say that you can own any weapon you want. It says there are certain weapons that you just can’t own. Even during when it was passed, you couldn’t own a cannon. You can’t own a machine gun
… he is talking nonsense—a string of logical fallacies—beginning with a red herring and a straw man argument, since the amendment does not address in any manner what weapons one can and can’t own. And of course, his mention of machine guns is a complete anachronism, given that they did not exist at the time the Constitution was written.
What the amendment does say is that the people have a right to bear arms because they end up being the ranks of the militia, meaning that the arms they bear need be of military grade. In the context of the times, this right to bear arms, second only to free speech in the numerical order of Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which were created in response to a wave of objections to the original, bare-bones version), was also written (in addition to raising a militia) as a response to the manner in which the British handled the colonists, forcing them to board their soldiers, etc., much like our taxes go to supporting the cartel’s gestapo.
The context for creating the Second Amendment also includes the sentiments of many at that time, as addressed by Jefferson, that the government should be replaced often, as it tends to become an instrument of tyranny. Jefferson understood that such circumstances were a result of the banks gaining power over the apparatus of state.
"I hope we shall take warning from the example and crush in it's [sic] birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws our country." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Logan, Nov. 12th, 1816,
“I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.” —Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President (1801–1809) in a letter written to John Taylor on May 28, 1816
"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion ... We have had thirteen States independent for eleven years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half, for each State. What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion?" --Thomas Jefferson to William S. Smith, 1787. ME 6:372
These remarks from Jefferson were what Biden was mocking, saying that possessing automatic weapons would not save you from the fascist power he represents, because they have F-16 fighter jets with missiles. Think about that. He is essentially verifying what gun owners are saying about the need to be armed to protect ourselves from “the government” in service to the cartel.
FDA revokes J&J covid vax authorization after millions already took the shot
As anyone who has studied the CDC’s own database (as well as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS]) knows, it is not just J&J’s injections that are responsible for the massive number of injuries and deaths. The harmfulness of their concoction is just the most obvious.
Likely, the revocation of emergency use authorization (EUA) for this particular brand will serve as a defense—for those who, years ago, planned and the executed the virus event—when they are brought to trial and attempt to convince the jury that they responded to the dangers when they discovered the issues.