The Agenda 2030 Olympiad
How global athletic competition became corporate-state propaganda
Orientation for new readers regarding the underlying research and data for this blog
Algeria's Imane Khelif (in red) and Italy's Angela Carini during their women’s 66kg preliminaries round of 16 boxing match during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games at the North Paris Arena, in Villepinte on 1 August 2024. Photo by Eliot Blondet, via Alamy.Lost amongst the manufactured squabble around Project 2025 (designed to further polarize the US red and blue political party marketing brand charade, entirely orchestrated by the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel and its intelligence service underlings who run the global for-profit corporate pyramid and various public-sector subsidiaries [the US, UK, EU, etc. for them]) is the larger and overreaching plan of the financiers being promoted via the UN entitled “TRANSFORMING OUR WORLD: THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.”
Before we delineate the history and dystopian nature of Agenda 2030 and its self-serving takeover of the Olympic movement, it’s worth reminding ourselves that the United Nations was built on land purchased by the Rockefellers, who continue to contribute to the funding of the organization and its various adjuncts.
We are not promoting “guilt by association” (a logical fallacy) here, because behind the fairy-tale proposals that headline Agenda 2030 lie the corporate state’s plans for a “one-world government” that serves the devolved objectives of the cartel: power, profit, propaganda, and population reduction:
The United Nations fits well into the Rockefeller family goal "to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world". Through United Nations programs such as Agenda 21, local decision making power is being eroded and being replaced by regional governments that continue to become more centralized. —http://www.connectingtheagenda.com/2016/11/connecting-rockefellers-to-united.html
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose directors have attended our meetings and upheld their promise to maintain confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would have been impossible to develop our global project if we had been in the public spotlight during those years. But the world is more sophisticated now and is more willing to move towards a global government where there will be no more war, but only peace and prosperity for all humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination that existed in past centuries.” —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.
“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.
From “Agenda 21 vs Agenda 2030 vs Agenda 2050 Explained”:
The title Agenda 21 came to light in 1992, during the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity:
It was during this time that The Wildlands Project was to be implemented
Here’s a quick summary of The Wildlands Project:
In 2008, The Rockefeller Foundation published America 2050: A strategy to Reclaim Natural Resources and Reform the Federal Role in Land Use. … this document outlines which areas of the USA will be depopulated and which areas will become the 10 new “MegaRegions”:
Basically, if we boil Agenda 21 down to its absolute simplest form, it is stealing land from Citizens under the guise of “conservation” then forcing them to live in predesignated “Zones”, controlled by a universal government, which means there is nowhere to flee ...
Agenda 21 was planned to be implemented by the year 2000 (AKA, “The 21st Century”, hence the name), but because it was running behind schedule, it was pushed back to 2030. Although the plan to seize the land and force resettlement into what we now refer to as “15 Minute Cities” remained, because the Agenda was being rescheduled, it gave them the opportunity to refine and redefine the Agenda goals, specifically, by adding new goals onto the preexisting goals; Enter: Agenda 2030.
Agenda 2030 also has a “Net 0 Carbon” scheme that involves a horrifying Carbon Credit System, Carbon Tax System and these are merged into a Social Credit Score System. None of this actually has to do with Carbon, because the elites have 0 interest in 0-Carbon for themselves. They devised a scheme where they can literally purchase “Carbon Credits” from each other. These credits allow them to break the 0-Carbon Rules they created so they can keep on Carbon-ing.
To boil Agenda 2030 down to its simplest form, it is the pre-existing Land Grab plus additional Land, on top of complete and total surveillance of everything and everyone. The surveillance involves putting limits on what you can own and do, in addition to assessing fines and penalties for failure to comply. Oh, and of course, the One World Government, New World Order fun. Agenda 2030 is where this comes from:
“You will own nothing and be happy.” Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum
The plans of the financiers and their psychopathic minions go further than this, described in Agenda 2050, but we will put that aside for the moment, since it is our willful and determined focus to end their madness long before that time.
In terms of how Agenda 2030 directly affects the current Olympics, let’s begin with LGBT rights, which have been hijacked and perverted into a depopulation event. We have no issue with anyone’s sexual orientation based on genetics and/or psychological and emotional orientation. Everyone is entitled to define themselves as they like, as long as they do not harm anyone else.
However, these preferences to not extend to forcing others to accept them, including preferred pronouns and such. For example, someone may feel that he or she is the reincarnation of Jesus Christ, but that does not mean I am going to address them as Lord Jesus or My Savior. The defining line is one’s physical body. Men who identify as women, whether they are wearing a dress and makeup or not, have no business in a women’s bathroom.
Genetics also play a role in athletic competition. A problem arose in the present “Olympics” in women’s boxing, where a couple of competitors have XY (male chromosomes). This issue also involves the participants’ genitalia, which can include aspects of both sexes.
But the bottom line is that two persons with male-level testosterone were allowed to fight women. The International Boxing Association prohibited these persons from competing in their events, so the Olympics decertified the IBA (a Russian-based organization) in order to enforce their agenda. The corporate-state media followed suit, calling the IBA “unreliable” and mounted a campaign to justify their PSYOPS (and here), but it is the IOC that is delusional. The IOC rests its case on the fact that these two persons were identified as female at birth, ignoring advancements in the science of sex and genetic testing.
It gets worse. The IOC, in its opening night presentation, extended the position of LBGT extremists by including drag queens reenacting the Last Supper, once again exposing children to this insulting, in-your-face irreligious sexual exhibitionism that belongs in gay nightclubs. Again, one’s sexual orientation is that person’s business, but if heterosexuals performed these same actions in public they would be rightfully condemned for inappropriate sexual displays.
Finally, there is the matter of the politicization of the Olympics by the western powers who have fallen back on their knee-jerk lies regarding Russia. It was the 2014 US-backed coup d’etat that overthrew the popularly elected government of Ukraine and installed and armed neo-Nazis who killed 14,000 ethnic Russians in the next eight years, prompting the ethnic Russian territories of eastern Ukraine to invite the Russians to stop this. So, it is the US and its NATO allies—the UK, France, Germany, Poland, etc.—that ought to be excluded from the “Olympics” based on their own standards.
Ultimately, this means that in the current “Olympics” any event in which the Russians are competitive and have been excluded is tainted. What is being broadcast worldwide is the Corporate-State Games. The real Olympics no longer exist.
We hope that you find our blog of value. If so, please feel free to share our articles and encourage others to sign up for our mailing list. Our last published work, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, Volume I, Access to Tools, is available here and here. Volume II, Application of Tools, is in the works. An earlier version of this sequel, published in 2019, is online in four sections, beginning here.