The second American revolution
The Declaration of Independence points the way
The Declaration of Independence is a 12-by-18-foot (oil-on-canvas painting by the American artist John Trumbull depicting the presentation of the draft of the Declaration of Independence to Congress.Given the current attempts by “the Biden administration” to start a nuclear war with Russia, let’s begin by revisiting a few choice words by Thomas Jefferson writing for the committee of the whole 248 years ago:
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. …
While many are quick to criticize the limitations of democracy established at that time, this document along with the Constitution were revolutionary for their time.
Unfortunately, the plans were short-lived, as the banking cartel went into actions swiftly to derail them.
"I hope we shall take warning from the example and crush in it's [sic] birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws our country." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Logan, Nov. 12th, 1816, http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/jefferson-the-works-vol-12-correspondence-and-papers-1816-1826
“I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.” —Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President (1801–1809) in a letter written to John Taylor on May 28, 1816
We have lived under the regime of the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel for a long time, although the majority of US, UK, and EU citizens are unaware of it. But take it from the horses’ mouths regarding who is running the show:
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose directors have attended our meetings and upheld their promise to maintain confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would have been impossible to develop our global project if we had been in the public spotlight during those years. But the world is more sophisticated now and is more willing to move towards a global government where there will be no more war, but only peace and prosperity for all humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination that existed in past centuries.” —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.
“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.
Publicly available documents concerning corporate ownership verify the claims above:
https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2018/12/global-corporate-power-structure.html
So, what is to be done when the courts, the Congress, and the Presidency are in the pockets of the banking cartel?
It is no coincidence that the President-elect is threatening to use the armed forces to deal with the immigration crisis, because as obvious and disgusting as this manufactured crisis is, it is really a means for normalizing a state of emergency whereby the cartel can mow down anyone protesting corporate control over the state (i.e., fascism).
Clearly, as is the case with so many second- and third-world countries (the US included), the armed forces could play a key role in overthrowing the usurping regime; however, in the wake of various leaks from the armed forces, under Obama the cartel consolidated US civilian and military intelligence, attempting to put a chokehold on those officers who took seriously their oath to the sovereignty of the US.
This does not mean that there is not some awareness within the military regarding the nature of the regime, but any such consciousness must be circumspect concerning relevant discussions and actions.
Aside from the military, there are certain state legislatures that have considered secession from the union. Of course, the so-called constitutional lawyers working for the cartel have attempted to argue that such secession is unconstitutional, but this is an untenable position given the unconstitutional nature by which the cartel took power and by which the cartel operates, using the Constitution only when it appears to support their unconstitutional objectives.
Thus, any secession resolutions on the part of states are valid, as long as the states are willing to activate their national guard troops and reject any attempt by the cartel to claim authority over these state militias.
It is for this very reason—the current circumstances—that the authors of the Constitution limited federal power over the sovereign states. Granted that the cartel has used the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution to broaden federal power, but in most cases this is unconstitutional overreach.
Finally, there is the matter of an educated minority of citizens declaring the regime illegitimate, just as the founding fathers did in congress, July 4th, 1776.
* * *
We hope that you find our blog of value. If so, please feel free to share our articles and encourage others to sign up for our mailing list. Our last published work, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, Volume I, Access to Tools, is available here and here. Volume II, Application of Tools, is in the process of being published. An earlier version of this sequel, published in 2019, is online in four sections, beginning here.