Frankly, this is a one sided report. Why didn't you write this report about the last admin? If you had, you would be worthy of reading. Censorship? Try doctors who were curing covid, proving that people didn't need to be coerced into a bioweapon, don't think it is one? Check the actuaries. How about supporting 'democracy in the Ukraine ( while pushing America into slums), when their actor 'leader' there suspends elections? truly, this imbalance is atrocious for a writer.
This post is about Trump, not about previous administrations which I have covered in detailed in previous posts that obviously you have not read. Apparently, you are lost in the red-blue political party marketing brand charade, thinking one party is better or worse than the other but, in fact, they are both owned and operated by the same small group of financiers. Perhaps you ought to do some research before revealing how little you know about my analyses in blogs and books before you start your series of logical fallacies (whataboutism, ad hominem, etc.).
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose directors have attended our meetings and upheld their promise to maintain confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would have been impossible to develop our global project if we had been in the public spotlight during those years. But the world is more sophisticated now and is more willing to move towards a global government where there will be no more war, but only peace and prosperity for all humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination that existed in past centuries.” —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.
“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.
Frankly, this is a one sided report. Why didn't you write this report about the last admin? If you had, you would be worthy of reading. Censorship? Try doctors who were curing covid, proving that people didn't need to be coerced into a bioweapon, don't think it is one? Check the actuaries. How about supporting 'democracy in the Ukraine ( while pushing America into slums), when their actor 'leader' there suspends elections? truly, this imbalance is atrocious for a writer.
This post is about Trump, not about previous administrations which I have covered in detailed in previous posts that obviously you have not read. Apparently, you are lost in the red-blue political party marketing brand charade, thinking one party is better or worse than the other but, in fact, they are both owned and operated by the same small group of financiers. Perhaps you ought to do some research before revealing how little you know about my analyses in blogs and books before you start your series of logical fallacies (whataboutism, ad hominem, etc.).
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose directors have attended our meetings and upheld their promise to maintain confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would have been impossible to develop our global project if we had been in the public spotlight during those years. But the world is more sophisticated now and is more willing to move towards a global government where there will be no more war, but only peace and prosperity for all humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination that existed in past centuries.” —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.
“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.
https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2018/12/global-corporate-power-structure.html